Monday, October 27, 2014

What to Ask During a Job Interview


By
interview question

Most people are trying so hard to impress a hiring manager during an interview that they forget to ask themselves if the interviewer impressed them.

They either don’t focus enough on the other person to know that answer or they ignore some clues because they really want–or need–a new job. As Paul Simon sang, “A man hears what he wants to hear. And disregards the rest.
I’m all in favor of focusing on the positive once you do have a job, but while you are interviewing you need to notice, and seriously consider, the negative. Otherwise, you may well wind up among the majority of people who say they are dissatisfied with their jobs.
Much of what is said during an interview, by both parties, is very general. Candidates make jargony statements about being hard workers or team players. Managers offer phrases such as, “we are committed to executing around here.” Those kind of statements are so broad, and so common, that they don’t have much meaning. They won’t tell you what you really want to know about a job and a company.
To get closer to the truth, you need to ask questions. That is, you need to ask specific questions to get specific answers.
Imagine you are buying a house. You don’t just find out its price. You ask a lot of very targeted questions. Has the basement ever flooded? How old is the furnace? The roof? You’ll hire an inspector to check the details. You want to know costs and dates.
Follow that same path when you’re interviewing, particularly in later rounds. Ask questions that require quantifiable or specific answers.
In a recent post on LinkedIn, serial entrepreneur James Caan gave a list of questions he thinks are good ones. Here’s one I liked: How will I be measured? As Caan writes, “You should walk out of that room knowing what you have to do to hit your targets and add value to the business.”
But here is one he suggested that I don’t like: What is the culture like?
Culture is one of those things that is so vague, and experienced differently by everyone, that most answers to that question really won’t help you. Instead, decide what culture really means to you before you go on an interview, and then ask specifics about those aspects that are your priorities. If camaraderie is important, ask how often colleagues socialize, what percentage of work will be done on teams, if there are team-building events, etc. If you want a supportive culture, ask about training programs, mentoring, how often performance reviews are conducted, how often team members meet with managers, and the like.
Of course, you don’t want to ask them all at once. An interview is not an interrogation. Sprinkle them throughout your conversations to get the most authentic answers and to appear confident and friendly, rather than confrontational or demanding. The final, crucial step: Listen to the answers.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

The 5 Biggest Mistakes I See on Resumes, and How to Correct Them

I've sent out hundreds of resumes over my career, applying for just about every kind of job. I've personally reviewed more than 20,000 resumes. And at Google we sometimes get more than 50,000 resumes in a single week.
I have seen A LOT of resumes.
Some are brilliant, most are just ok, many are disasters. The toughest part is that for 15 years, I've continued to see the same mistakes made again and again by candidates, any one of which can eliminate them from consideration for a job. What's most depressing is that I can tell from the resumes that many of these are good, even great, people. But in a fiercely competitive labor market, hiring managers don't need to compromise on quality. All it takes is one small mistake and a manager will reject an otherwise interesting candidate.
I know this is well-worn ground on LinkedIn, but I'm starting here because -- I promise you -- more than half of you have at least one of these mistakes on your resume. And I'd much rather see folks win jobs than get passed over.
In the interest of helping more candidates make it past that first resume screen, here are the five biggest mistakes I see on resumes.
Mistake 1: Typos. This one seems obvious, but it happens again and again. A 2013 CareerBuilder survey found that 58% of resumes have typos.
In fact, people who tweak their resumes the most carefully can be especially vulnerable to this kind of error, because they often result from going back again and again to fine tune your resume just one last time. And in doing so, a subject and verb suddenly don't match up, or a period is left in the wrong place, or a set of dates gets knocked out of alignment. I see this in MBA resumes all the time. Typos are deadly because employers interpret them as a lack of detail-orientation, as a failure to care about quality. The fix?
Read your resume from bottom to top: reversing the normal order helps you focus on each line in isolation. Or have someone else proofread closely for you.
Mistake 2: Length. A good rule of thumb is one page of resume for every ten years of work experience. Hard to fit it all in, right? But a three or four or ten page resume simply won't get read closely. As Blaise Pascal wrote, "I would have written you a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." A crisp, focused resume demonstrates an ability to synthesize, prioritize, and convey the most important information about you. Think about it this way: the *sole* purpose of a resume is to get you an interview. That's it. It's not to convince a hiring manager to say "yes" to you (that's what the interview is for) or to tell your life's story (that's what a patient spouse is for). Your resume is a tool that gets you to that first interview. Once you're in the room, the resume doesn't matter much. So cut back your resume. It's too long.
Mistake 3: Formatting. Unless you're applying for a job such as a designer or artist, your focus should be on making your resume clean and legible. At least ten point font. At least half-inch margins. White paper, black ink. Consistent spacing between lines, columns aligned, your name and contact information on every page. If you can, look at it in both Google Docs and Word, and then attach it to an email and open it as a preview. Formatting can get garbled when moving across platforms. Saving it as a PDF is a good way to go.
Mistake 4: Confidential information. I once received a resume from an applicant working at a top-three consulting firm. This firm had a strict confidentiality policy: client names were never to be shared. On the resume, the candidate wrote: "Consulted to a major software company in Redmond, Washington." Rejected! There's an inherent conflict between your employer's needs (keep business secrets confidential) and your needs (show how awesome I am so I can get a better job). So candidates often find ways to honor the letter of their confidentiality agreements but not the spirit. It's a mistake. While this candidate didn't mention Microsoft specifically, any reviewer knew that's what he meant. In a very rough audit, we found that at least 5-10% of resumes reveal confidential information. Which tells me, as an employer, that I should never hire those candidates ... unless I want my own trade secrets emailed to my competitors.
The New York Times test is helpful here: if you wouldn't want to see it on the home page of the NYT with your name attached (or if your boss wouldn't!), don't put it on your resume.
Mistake 5: Lies. This breaks my heart. Putting a lie on your resume is never, ever, ever, worth it. Everyone, up to and including CEOs, get fired for this. (Google "CEO fired for lying on resumes" and see.) People lie about their degrees (three credits shy of a college degree is not a degree), GPAs (I've seen hundreds of people "accidentally" round their GPAs up, but never have I seen one accidentally rounded down -- never), and where they went to school (sorry, but employers don't view a degree granted online for "life experience" as the same as UCLA or Seton Hall). People lie about how long they were at companies, how big their teams were, and their sales results, always goofing in their favor.
There are three big problems with lying: (1) You can easily get busted. The Internet, reference checks, and people who worked at your company in the past can all reveal your fraud. (2) Lies follow you forever. Fib on your resume and 15 years later get a big promotion and are discovered? Fired. And try explaining that in your next interview. (3) Our Moms taught us better. Seriously.
So this is how to mess up your resume. Don't do it! Hiring managers are looking for the best people they can find, but the majority of us all but guarantee that we'll get rejected.
The good news is that -- precisely because most resumes have these kinds of mistakes -- avoiding them makes you stand out.
In a future post, I'll expand beyond what not to do, and cover the things you *should* be doing to make your resume stand out from the stack.

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

The best-paying jobs in 2014

The best-paying jobs in 2014

Be prepared to stay in school for a long time if you want one of these lucrative jobs.
1 of 12
Air Traffic Controller, Surgeons working in an operating room; © Cultura RM/Koca Little Company/Getty Images; © nimon_t/Getty Images; © 4x6/Getty Images
Advanced degrees, advanced salaries
The highest paying jobs seem to go to those who paid high tuitions.
According to CareerCast’s 10 Best-Paying Jobs of 2014, seven out of 10 of the highest paid professions are in the health care industry and require advanced degrees. This means that a six-figure salary can often come at the expense of six-figure debt. For instance, general practice physicians make an average of $187,200 a year, but according to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the medical school class of 2013 graduated with a median debt of $175,000, and 86% of all graduates left with some debt.
The highest paid salary on the list went to surgeons, who make an average of $233,150 a year; general practice physicians came in second. In ninth and tenth place were podiatrists at $116,440, and attorneys, at $113,530, who also face a lot of education before they can practice.
There were only two high paying jobs on the list that don’t require graduate degrees: petroleum engineers and air traffic controllers, who on average make $130,280 and $122,530 respectively. The report cautioned, though, that “for those who choose a different path [than graduate education] to attain one of the best-paying jobs, be prepared to exchange paychecks for a high level of stress.” It described air traffic controllers as dealing with “some of the most stressful working conditions.”
Despite stressful working conditions, jobs as air traffic controllers are hardly up for grabs. The industry predicts only a 1% growth outlook by 2022. Petroleum engineers, however, can look forward to a 26% growth outlook in the same period. All of the health care professions on the list anticipate growth of 14% or higher. “As baby-boomer doctors … reach retirement, there often aren’t enough new doctors,” explained CareerCast publisher Tony Lee.
Click through the gallery to see the highest paid jobs and the projected growth of each.
More from Forbes
1 of 12
247Comments
Wed 9:47 PM
avatar
I wonder how much the out of state protesters in Missouri are making.
Sat 11:19 AM
avatar
Best advice I received regarding career choice was find what you like/love to do and be happy. The rest will take care of itself.  Life is too short to be toiling in a miserable career choice. Money doesn't buy happiness.
Thu 10:55 AM
avatar
So... go through med school for 7 yrs making no money, then another year of internship with no pay, rack up $300,000 in student loans - then you can start making $200,000 a year with take home pay of $100,000.  Break even after 10 or 15 years? 
Then the Democrats try to force you into taking 40% pay cuts for socialized medicine or the Dems won't allow you to see their patients.
Our Healthcare industry is doomed.
Thu 12:50 PM
avatar
They forgot about Congress, CEOs CFO's, Wall Street traders all make much more than many of those listed here.
Sat 9:21 PM
avatar
THIS COUNTRY HAS MADE IT TO WHERE WE THAT WILL WORK OWE THE REST OF THE LAZY, DOPE HEADS, AND THE MINORITIES A LIVING, WHAT HAPPEN TO IF YOU DON'T WORK YOU DON'T EAT OR BITCH ABOUT IT. I MYSELF AM SICK AND TIRED OF SUPPORTING THESE SORRY PIECES OF ----. THIS COUNTRY TAXES ME HALF OF WHAT I GROSS IN PAY THIS IS A DAMN SHAME.
Thu 9:58 AM
avatar
I'm sure this article will get a lot of hopes up. Bottom line is this people. Either stand together, rise up and take our nation back from the greedy evil that has hi-jacked it, or continue to live in an ever worsening state of financial squalor. Plain and simple.
Sun 1:48 PM
avatar
This article seems to have an agenda. With no mention of software engineers, CEOs, Wall Street Tycoons, Financial "experts," and many others, I think that MSN it trying to stir resentment against certain groups while deflecting contempt from others here. 
Thu 8:09 AM
avatar
All will be well in Ferguson Mo. we have the corrupt  kings sidekick going to straighten it all out. Eric Holder should be investigating his own corruption, not our law enforcement.
Sun 2:59 PM
avatar
Yaha Yaha Yaha
Thanks so much for enlightening us. BS
My Son completed his 4 year degree. Aggressively looked for work for 2 years. Nothing but Jersey Mikes to get by. Fell back on plan "B". Joined the armed services. And even K Kristofferson's Boy joined. Sorry to hear about the graduates having so much debt. But America thrives on "financial servitude". I think joining the military is a valuable experience. Maybe one day people will realize how corrupt this country is and fight to get it back.
Love my country, fear my government.
Sat 9:59 PM
avatar
I know a lot of school administrators make high salaries. Many Superintendents make 150,000 to 200,000 +  Why are they worth that??? 
Sat 10:14 PM
avatar
Many of those poor families have kids that enlist in the military to protect some of you selfish people and your way of life and freedoms....  They die for you. When many of the injured troops come back they do not get the care they need because the VA is short of funds, YET the VA is building big expensive inefficient facilities and many military that sat behind a desk for their careers get nice benefits. 
avatar
They left out our politicians. They are raping the taxpayers and reaping the benefits.
Sat 1:15 PM
avatar
By Terence P Jeffrey

109,631,000 Americans lived in households that received benefits from one or more federally funded "means-tested programs" — also known as welfare — as of the fourth quarter of 2012, according to data released yesterday by the Census Bureau.
The Census Bureau has not yet reported how many were on welfare in 2013 or the first two quarters of 2014.
But the 109,631,000 living in households taking federal welfare benefits as of the end of 2012, according to the Census Bureau, equaled 35.4 percent of all 309,467,000 people living in the United States at that time.
When those receiving benefits from non-means-tested federal programs — such as Social Security, Medicare, unemployment and veterans benefits — were added to those taking welfare benefits, it turned out that 153,323,000 people were getting federal benefits of some type at the end of 2012.
Subtract the 3,297,000 who were receiving veterans' benefits from the total, and that leaves 150,026,000 people receiving non-veterans' benefits.
The 153,323,000 total benefit-takers at the end of 2012, said the Census Bureau, equaled 49.5 percent of the population. The 150,026,000 taking benefits other than veterans' benefits equaled about 48.5 percent of the population.
When America re-elected President Barack Obama in 2012, we had not quite reached the point where more than half the country was taking benefits from the federal government.
It is a reasonable bet, however, that with the implementation of Obamacare — with its provisions expanding Medicaid and providing health-insurance subsidies to people earning up to 400 percent of poverty — that if we have not already surpassed that point (not counting those getting veterans benefits) we soon will.
What did taxpayers give to the 109,631,000 — the 35.4 percent of the nation — getting welfare benefits at the end of 2012?
82,679,000 of the welfare-takers lived in households where people were on Medicaid, said the Census Bureau. 51,471,000 were in households on food stamps. 22,526,000 were in the Women, Infants and Children program. 20,355,000 were in household on Supplemental Security Income. 13,267,000 lived in public housing or got housing subsidies. 5,442,000 got Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. 4,517,000 received other forms of federal cash assistance.
How do you put in perspective the 109,631,000 people taking welfare, or the 150,026,000 getting some type of federal benefit other than veterans' benefits?
Well, the CIA World Factbook says there are 142,470,272 people in Russia. So, the 150,026,000 people getting non-veterans federal benefits in the United States at the end of 2012 outnumbered all the people in Russia.
63,742,977 people live in the United Kingdom and 44,291,413 live in the Ukraine, says the CIA. So, the combined 108,034,390 people in these two nations was about 1,596,610 less than 109,631,000 collecting welfare in the United States..........
Sun 2:15 PM
avatar
Many med students getting ready to graduate this year will find a tougher job market out there, and lower wages. Very few if any will have any chance of opening their own office, and most will find work at hospitals. The thing about hospitals is they now expect the physician who is also a employee to generate income, whether it is through surgery's, lab or other diagnostic tests, or just seeing patients. Gone are the days when the physician was worshiped by adoring administrative officials, and nurses alike. Today it's all about the money, and how much did you make for the business today. Under performers are whisked away, and must start their search all over again. 
Sat 10:05 PM
avatar
Whine whine, 62 percent of the people on food stamps are working families. They work full-time and still do not make above poverty level wages. You want to trade places with them, since you think they have it so great!!!
Sun 5:10 PM
avatar
dont forget heavy equipment operators. my base salary is 130000 a year outside of o t . i work in downtown boston. dont believe me look it up. 
Thu 10:53 AM
avatar
How dare there be such a salary descrepancy between these jobs and the Wal-mart greeters.  How is that fair.  How do you expect the Wal-mart greeters and burger flippers to live when these people are making such excessive wages?  Shouldn't they be limited to a certain multiple of the Wal-mart greeters wages? 

Now how is this all related to the events in MO?
1) Through the growth of the dependency class and the politicians that cater to their needs require increased taxes to pay for this dependency. Increases in the minimum wage violates the laws of supply and demand and over inflates the cost of unskilled labor and drives up the cost of skilled labor because of the inflated prices of other goods and services.
2) The same decline of moral values that leads to looting and destruction of property and leads also to the loss belief in self responsibility and a need to depend on the federal government for economic and social solution as opposed to family and neighbors.  It allows people to exist in a state of contentment without having to work, or improve their skillset.
3) The creation of a special class within US society has led to people that believe they are above the law. This balkanization is facilitated by the federal government treating people differently under the law based on such qualities as race, sex, age, national origin, sexual preference, marital status, and income. Why should any one US citizen be treated differently under the law than any other US citizen? What should be the basis of this treatment difference?
Thu 12:22 AM
avatar
My sister in law is a lawyer at a well known firm in Rhode Island and she makes less then what it said in the slideshow. I believe salaries has always ranged by states MSN.
Thu 5:55 PM
avatar
Go for Medical Technologist (Clinical Lab Scientist) if you are interested in biology and chemistry. I graduated with a Biology degree and found out that the job market is tough for a college graduate first hand. Took a couple more years of college to finally get the MLS certification and a decent paying job. I wanted to be able to help people but didn't want to deal with the constant patient interaction that a nurse deals with. 

Albeit the pay can be considered low (starts at 18-24 dollars an hour in most areas) for the amount of work that you have to deal with but the ability to move inbetween different laboratories and the chances of becoming a lead tech/manager really makes the field seem great. The interaction between analyzer and hands-on work interaction also means that you will be busy and that the day flies by. Additionally, clinical lab scientists should be in higher demand (there is already close to 100% placement for graduates) in the future as the current work force trends towards an older employee base.

That's my recommendation for people interested in healthcare but don't really want to deal with patients 24/7. You have to start somewhere and with a high demand for employees it's hard to beat this job and I consider myself fortunate to be able to help cancer patients on a daily basis in a job that I truly enjoy.


Thu 11:37 AM
avatar
Panhandler, No student loans, no overhead safe a piece of cardboard and felt tip pen and your protected under the first amendment because charities and Washington lobbyists do it all the time and I live in a van down by the river so no debt. I'm going to start my own think tank which will make me a small business owner maybe a small business loan or better yet a government contract. I'll need crowd source funding for my start up? Let's run this up the flag pole and see how she waves what do say gang.    

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Has Loyalty Become a Curse?

Ian Collopy

One only has to trawl through LinkedIn to see that these days many people in many different industries frequently leave their jobs to join another organisation. I noticed it increasingly happening during my twelve years at my previous permanent job with Acxiom Australia, a marketing data services company. Many people circulated amongst the main competitors which included Experian, Veda, Salmat, Global Red etc. They would spend about two years at company A, plotting how to take market share from company B only to then join company B and start plotting to take market share from their former friends at company A.
Many times at Acxiom Australia positions would be filled by people with track records of frequent job hopping and then when they inevitably hopped away again the whole process of finding a replacement would have to be undertaken yet again, causing much angst for those affected.
The question must be asked - why are these job hopping people so readily hired? Is there a perception that they have a broader range of experience gained from working for many different organisations? Many of them could be 'jacks of many trades but masters of none'. If the latter were true it would explain to some extent why organisations might not offer a lot more pay to try to retain them.
Since being made redundant last year I have been unable to secure another permanent job and many people have told me I'm disadvantaged by having stayed with the same company for too long (12.5 years). Several other loyal and talented 12 year plus people were made redundant by Acxiom the previous year and some of them have also struggled to find permanent employment. Some of them had some temporary work but are now out of work again.
Presumably the motivation for job hopping is to get a higher rate of pay at the new organisation but of course there is some risk that things won't work out and they could be out of work in a short time. It is for this reason that parents are probably less likely to engage in job hopping than their carefree bachelor and spinster colleagues. That was certainly the case with me. By staying in what I thought was a safe and steady job I was able to ensure we could continue to live in a good suburb and our son could keep attending a good school. As the average age for having children continues to increase then the proportion of these successful job hoppers will also increase but eventually many of them will also become parents and tend to stay in a job longer, possibly even suffering the same fate as me and some of my former colleagues.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply from:
Fintan Guihen
Fintan Guihen
Database Administrator at RCSI
The key here is to ensure you are growing and learning all the time. There are a lot of "loyal" people in roles for 5 years or more that don't actually have 5 years experience, they have 1 years experience 5 times over. A good recruiter or interviewer will see this quickly, and so by staying and being loyal, you are limiting your career progression/choices. If you find a company where you are challenged daily, so the job stays fresh and you are increasing your experience all the time then yes, stay put for 5/10 or more years, be loyal. The company is being loyal to you by giving you a job you are gaining new experience in all the time. Loyalty is great, as long as it is reciprocated and you feel you are getting real experience, not just coming in and doing the same thing over and over and over for years, without really growing and learning.